Sean Thornley vs Navdeep Singh Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W L L W L
Form
L W L L L L L L L LCara A Cara: Thornley 1 - 0 Singh
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Thornley victoriosa 2 y Singh victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Thornley y Singh fue en el Kuwait F2, el 25-05-2009, Cuartos de First, Hard, con Sean Thornley obteniendo la victoria 6-1 6-0
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sean Thornley | 1 |
| Navdeep Singh | 0 |
Kuwait F2(25-05-2009)
6
1
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Svitolina VS Sakkari PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
| 12 | Juegos Ganados | 1 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Faltas dobles totales | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Primer Servicio | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Sean Thornley
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Sean Thornley
Player
Andrew Whittington
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Sean Thornley
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Younes Rachidi
Player
Sean Thornley
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
48)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ariel Behar
Player
Sean Thornley
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sean Thornley
Player
Tristan Tringali
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Carter
Player
Sean Thornley
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
91)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregory Ouellette
Player
Sean Thornley
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
11
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Sean Thornley
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
12
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sean Thornley
Player
Efe Yurtacan
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Sean Thornley
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Navdeep Singh
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 0-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Navdeep Singh
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43% (127/169) | Win/Loss | 32% (45/94) |
| 44% (291/369) | Sets Win/Loss | 36% (111/201) |
| 48% (2961/3209) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (1256/1584) |
| 49% (71/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (43/67) |
| 29% (6/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 9% (2/20) |
| 38% (33/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/7) |
| 39% (17/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 115 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 172 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 525.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 431.1 |
| 55% (1118/2050) | 1st Serve % | 64% (139/216) |
| 68% (756/1118) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (85/139) |
| 45% (423/932) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (44/77) |
| 46% (73/160) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (6/18) |
| 37% (700/1869) | Return Points Win % | 38% (76/200) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (20/37) | Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 45% (105/126) | Futures W/L | 32% (41/88) |
| 44% (126/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (43/135) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (42/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (11/27) |
| 50% (37/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 84% (122/102) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (50/39) |
| 16% (122/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (50/11) |
| 14% (173/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (89/6) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
